Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
*Duerlinger, James. ''Indian Buddhist Theories of Persons: Vasubandhu’s Refutation of the Theory of a ‘Self.’'' London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003. | *Duerlinger, James. ''Indian Buddhist Theories of Persons: Vasubandhu’s Refutation of the Theory of a ‘Self.’'' London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003. | ||
*Duus, Peter. ''The Abacus and the Sword: The Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1895-1910''. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. | *Duus, Peter. ''The Abacus and the Sword: The Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1895-1910''. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. | ||
- | *Elman, Benjamin A. ''On Their Own Terms: Science in China 1550-1900''. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005. | + | *Elman, Benjamin A. ''From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China.'' Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2001. |
+ | *-----''On Their Own Terms: Science in China 1550-1900''. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005. | ||
*Engle, Artemus B. ''The Inner Science of Buddhist Practice: Vasubandhu’s Summary of the Five Heaps with Commentary by Sthiramati.'' Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications, 2009. | *Engle, Artemus B. ''The Inner Science of Buddhist Practice: Vasubandhu’s Summary of the Five Heaps with Commentary by Sthiramati.'' Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications, 2009. | ||
*Fafang 法舫. “Weishixue yu kexue: Pingpo Jin Han jun zhi [Foxue bashi zhi piping yu yanjiu] 唯識學與科學:評破錦漢君之【佛學八識之批評與研究】,” Part 1. ''Haichao yin'', vol. 10, no. 3 (1929a): MFQ 172.355-367. | *Fafang 法舫. “Weishixue yu kexue: Pingpo Jin Han jun zhi [Foxue bashi zhi piping yu yanjiu] 唯識學與科學:評破錦漢君之【佛學八識之批評與研究】,” Part 1. ''Haichao yin'', vol. 10, no. 3 (1929a): MFQ 172.355-367. | ||
Line 179: | Line 180: | ||
*Li Xiangping 李向平. ''Jiushi yu jiuxin: Zhongguo jindai Fojiao fuxing sichao yanjiu'' 救世與救心:中国近代佛教復興與思潮. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 1993. | *Li Xiangping 李向平. ''Jiushi yu jiuxin: Zhongguo jindai Fojiao fuxing sichao yanjiu'' 救世與救心:中国近代佛教復興與思潮. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 1993. | ||
*Liang Qichao 梁啓超 ''Dasheng Qixinlun kaozheng''大乗起信論考證. Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan reprint of 1922 text. | *Liang Qichao 梁啓超 ''Dasheng Qixinlun kaozheng''大乗起信論考證. Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan reprint of 1922 text. | ||
- | * | + | *-----. “Fojiao xinli qiance 佛教心理學淺測.” ''Haichao yin'', vol. 11, no. 6 (1930): MFQ 175.407-420. |
+ | *-----. ''Intellectual Trends in the Ch’ing Period.'' Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970. | ||
*Liang Shuming, "Jiuyuan jueyilun" 究元決疑論, vol. 1: 1-22. In Liang Shuming quanji 梁漱溟全集. Ji’nan: Shandong renmin, 1989-1993. | *Liang Shuming, "Jiuyuan jueyilun" 究元決疑論, vol. 1: 1-22. In Liang Shuming quanji 梁漱溟全集. Ji’nan: Shandong renmin, 1989-1993. | ||
*-----. ''Yinduzhexue gailun'' 印度哲學概論, vol 1: 23-247. | *-----. ''Yinduzhexue gailun'' 印度哲學概論, vol 1: 23-247. | ||
Line 352: | Line 354: | ||
*-----. "A Defense of Yogācāra Buddhism." Philosophy East and West, 46/4 (1996): 447-476. | *-----. "A Defense of Yogācāra Buddhism." Philosophy East and West, 46/4 (1996): 447-476. | ||
*Welch, Holmes. ''The Buddhist Revival in China''. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968. | *Welch, Holmes. ''The Buddhist Revival in China''. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968. | ||
+ | * Williams, Paul. ''Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations.'' London and New York: Routledge,1989. | ||
*Wŏnhyo 元曉. ''Jingang sanmei jing lun'' 金剛三昧經論i (Commentary on ''Vajrasamādhi Sūtra'') T.34.1730. | *Wŏnhyo 元曉. ''Jingang sanmei jing lun'' 金剛三昧經論i (Commentary on ''Vajrasamādhi Sūtra'') T.34.1730. | ||
*Wood, Thomas E. ''Mind Only: A Philosophical and Doctrinal Analysis of the Vijñānavāda''. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1991. | *Wood, Thomas E. ''Mind Only: A Philosophical and Doctrinal Analysis of the Vijñānavāda''. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1991. |
TRANSFORMING CONSCIOUSNESS-Common Bibliography
Citations should be made according to the Chicago Manual of Style (13th, 14th, or 15th eds.) modified for the Stylesheet of the Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. For simple questions regarding Chicago Style, one may consult the Chicago Manual of Style Quick Guide.
Specific Exceptions:
Simple instructions for HTML for this page:
Contents |