Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* An Yanming. "Liang Shuming and Henri Bergson on intuition: cultural context and the evolution of terms." Philosophy East & West 47 (1997): 337-362. | * An Yanming. "Liang Shuming and Henri Bergson on intuition: cultural context and the evolution of terms." Philosophy East & West 47 (1997): 337-362. | ||
*Anacker, Stefan. ''Seven Works of Vasubandhu, The Buddhist Psychological Doctor.'' Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1984. | *Anacker, Stefan. ''Seven Works of Vasubandhu, The Buddhist Psychological Doctor.'' Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1984. | ||
+ | *App, Urs.“Arthur Schopenhauer and China: A Sino-Platonic Love Affair,” ''Sino-Platonic Papers'' (April 2010). | ||
*Aviv, Eyal. “Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu (1871-1943) and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 2008. | *Aviv, Eyal. “Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu (1871-1943) and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 2008. | ||
*Bai Tongdong 白彤東. "Xinxing ruxue haishi zhengzhi ruxue? Xin bang jiu ming haishi jiu bang xinming? Guanyu ruxue fuxing de jidian sikao" 心性儒學還是政治儒學? 新邦舊命還是舊邦新命?--關於儒學復興的集點思考. ''Kaifang shidai'', no. 11 (2010): 5-25. | *Bai Tongdong 白彤東. "Xinxing ruxue haishi zhengzhi ruxue? Xin bang jiu ming haishi jiu bang xinming? Guanyu ruxue fuxing de jidian sikao" 心性儒學還是政治儒學? 新邦舊命還是舊邦新命?--關於儒學復興的集點思考. ''Kaifang shidai'', no. 11 (2010): 5-25. | ||
Line 140: | Line 141: | ||
*-----. ''The Summary of the Great Vehicle.'' Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, 1992. | *-----. ''The Summary of the Great Vehicle.'' Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, 1992. | ||
*Ketelaar, James Edward. ''Of heretics and martyrs in Meiji Japan: Buddhism and its persecution''. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. | *Ketelaar, James Edward. ''Of heretics and martyrs in Meiji Japan: Buddhism and its persecution''. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. | ||
+ | *Kim Cheran 김제란. “Chungguk kŭndae sahoe jinhwaron suyong-e taehan Pulgyojŏk pip’an: Chang Taeyŏn ŭi ‘kubunjinhwaron’ ŭl chungsim-ŭro" 중국근대 사회진화론 수영에 대한 불교적 비판: 章太炎의 「倶分進化論」을 중심으로 (Buddhist Critic on Acceptance of the Theory of Social Evolution in Modern China – centering around the thought of Zhang Taiyan), ''Pulgyo hakbo'' 49 (Aug 2008): 321-343. | ||
*Kim Cheran 김제란. “Tong Sŏhak ŭi maegaerosŏ ŭi yusikhak ŭi yuhaeng" 동.서학의 매개로서 唯識學의 유행(The Prevalence of Consciousness Only School as the intermediation of Eastern and Western Cultures: Centering around the Relationship of Consciousness Only School and the Philosophy of Bergson), ''Pulgyo hakbo'' 47 (Aug 2007): 229-254. | *Kim Cheran 김제란. “Tong Sŏhak ŭi maegaerosŏ ŭi yusikhak ŭi yuhaeng" 동.서학의 매개로서 唯識學의 유행(The Prevalence of Consciousness Only School as the intermediation of Eastern and Western Cultures: Centering around the Relationship of Consciousness Only School and the Philosophy of Bergson), ''Pulgyo hakbo'' 47 (Aug 2007): 229-254. | ||
*Kim Hosŏng 金浩星. “Bagavatdogītā to Daijōnehankyō ni okeru bōryoku/sensō no shōtōka mondai"「バガヴァッド。ギーター」と「大涅槃経」における暴力。戦争の正当化問題 (The Justification of Violence and war in the Bhagavad gīta and the Mahāyāna-Nirvāṇa-Sūtra), ''Kankoku Bukkyōgaku Seminar'' 韓国仏教学SEMINAR(Journal of Korean Buddhist Seminar: Korean Students’ Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies, Tokyo) 9 (2003): 149-166. | *Kim Hosŏng 金浩星. “Bagavatdogītā to Daijōnehankyō ni okeru bōryoku/sensō no shōtōka mondai"「バガヴァッド。ギーター」と「大涅槃経」における暴力。戦争の正当化問題 (The Justification of Violence and war in the Bhagavad gīta and the Mahāyāna-Nirvāṇa-Sūtra), ''Kankoku Bukkyōgaku Seminar'' 韓国仏教学SEMINAR(Journal of Korean Buddhist Seminar: Korean Students’ Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies, Tokyo) 9 (2003): 149-166. | ||
Line 232: | Line 234: | ||
*-----. "Ehu zhi hui: Zhongguo wenhua fazhan zhong de da zonghe yu Zhong-Xi chuantong de ronghui" 鵝湖之會:中國文化發展中的大綜和與中西傳統的融會 (Meeting at Goose Lake: the great synthesis in the development of Chinese culture and the merging of Chinese and Western tradition), vol. 27, pp. 445-458. In ''Mou Zongsan xiansheng quanji'' 牟宗三先生全集 [Complete works of Mou Zongsan]. Taipei: Lianjing, 2003. | *-----. "Ehu zhi hui: Zhongguo wenhua fazhan zhong de da zonghe yu Zhong-Xi chuantong de ronghui" 鵝湖之會:中國文化發展中的大綜和與中西傳統的融會 (Meeting at Goose Lake: the great synthesis in the development of Chinese culture and the merging of Chinese and Western tradition), vol. 27, pp. 445-458. In ''Mou Zongsan xiansheng quanji'' 牟宗三先生全集 [Complete works of Mou Zongsan]. Taipei: Lianjing, 2003. | ||
*-----. “Keguan de liaojie yu Zhongguo wenhua zhi zaizao 客關的瞭解與中國文化之再造 (Objective understanding and the remaking of Chinese culture)," vol. 27, pp. 419-438. In ''Mou Zongsan xiansheng quanji'' 牟宗三先生全集 [Complete works of Mou Zongsan]. Taipei: Lianjing, 2003. | *-----. “Keguan de liaojie yu Zhongguo wenhua zhi zaizao 客關的瞭解與中國文化之再造 (Objective understanding and the remaking of Chinese culture)," vol. 27, pp. 419-438. In ''Mou Zongsan xiansheng quanji'' 牟宗三先生全集 [Complete works of Mou Zongsan]. Taipei: Lianjing, 2003. | ||
- | *-----, Xu Fuguan 徐復觀, Zhang Junmai 張君勱, Tang Junyi 唐君毅. “Wei Zhongguo wenhua jinggao shijie renshi xuanyan: women dui Zhongguo xueshu yanjiu ji Zhongguo wenhua yu shijie wenhua qiantu zhi gongtong renshi為中國文化敬告世界人士宣言─我們對中國學術研究及中國文化與世界文化前途之共同認識 (A manifesto to the world on behalf of Chinese culture: our common opinion about Chinese scholarship and culture and the future of world culture),” downloaded from arts.cuhk.edu.hk/~kwaipiu/chinese, accessed July 9, 2011, 2. | + | *-----, Xu Fuguan 徐復觀, Zhang Junmai 張君勱, Tang Junyi 唐君毅. “Wei Zhongguo wenhua jinggao shijie renshi xuanyan: women dui Zhongguo xueshu yanjiu ji Zhongguo wenhua yu shijie wenhua qiantu zhi gongtong renshi為中國文化敬告世界人士宣言─我們對中國學術研究及中國文化與世界文化前途之共同認識 (A manifesto to the world on behalf of Chinese culture: our common opinion about Chinese scholarship and culture and the future of world culture),” downloaded from arts.cuhk.edu.hk/~kwaipiu/chinese, accessed July 9, 2011, 2. |
+ | *Müller, Martin. “Aspects of the Chinese Reception of Kant,” ''Journal of Chinese Philosophy'' 33 (1) (2006): 142-157. | ||
*Murao Susumu 村尾進. “’Banki sen-sen’: Jimu hō jiki no Ryō Keichō” 万木森々:時務報時期と梁啓超 in Hazama Naoki 狭間直樹, comp. ''Kyōdō kenkyū: Seiyō kindaishisō juyō to Meiji Nihon'' 共同研究:西洋近代思想受容と明治日本. Misuzu shobō, 1999, pp. 37-73. | *Murao Susumu 村尾進. “’Banki sen-sen’: Jimu hō jiki no Ryō Keichō” 万木森々:時務報時期と梁啓超 in Hazama Naoki 狭間直樹, comp. ''Kyōdō kenkyū: Seiyō kindaishisō juyō to Meiji Nihon'' 共同研究:西洋近代思想受容と明治日本. Misuzu shobō, 1999, pp. 37-73. | ||
*Nagao, Gadjin. ''Mādhyamika and Yogācāra: A Study of Mahāyāna Philosophies.'' Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991. | *Nagao, Gadjin. ''Mādhyamika and Yogācāra: A Study of Mahāyāna Philosophies.'' Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991. |
TRANSFORMING CONSCIOUSNESS-Common Bibliography
Citations should be made according to the Chicago Manual of Style (13th, 14th, or 15th eds.) modified for the Stylesheet of the Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. For simple questions regarding Chicago Style, one may consult the Chicago Manual of Style Quick Guide.
Specific Exceptions:
Simple instructions for HTML for this page:
Contents |