Institution Article Guidelines - Revision history

Greg: Created page with '== Institution Article Guidelines == * Please use the sample Blank Institution article for starting new entries on institutions * Add {{EditStatus|status=X}}
2009-06-17T02:06:22Z

Created page with '== Institution Article Guidelines == * Please use the sample Blank Institution article for starting new entries on institutions * Add <nowiki>{{EditStatus|status=X}}</nowiki...'

New page
== Institution Article Guidelines ==

* Please use the sample [[Blank Institution]] article for starting new entries on institutions
* Add <nowiki>{{EditStatus|status=X}}</nowiki> to the '''discussion page''' of the article, filling in A, B, C, or "start" for the status (see below)

'''Edit Status Guidelines'''

These are the general guidelines for determining the edit status of entries of institution articles:

{|style="width:80%" border=1 frame=box cellpadding=2 cellspacing=2
|-
|A||This article contains information on the dates during which this organization, group, or event was viable. Names of founders, leaders, and/or prominent participants are also included. Where possible, the goals and affiliations (religious, societal, etc.) will be noted. For schools and institutions, the names of notable students and teachers will also be listed. If the oganization was involved in any publication activities (books, canons, periodicals, etc.), this is included. The source of all information is documented.
|-
|B||One of the following is true: This article is lacking some portion of the information listed under "A"; OR it must be revised for minor style or structural issues, or mistakes.
|-
|C||This article lacks much of the information outlined in "A", and/or has serious style, structural, or correction issues that need attending to.
|-
|Start||The article only contains the most basic information about the subject, and needs much more content to be considered complete.
|}