Dasheng qixin lun zhenwei bian 大乘起信論真偽辯 - Revision history

Greg at 07:41, 10 April 2011

2011-04-10T07:41:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 10 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	== Debate over the authenticity of the ''Mahāyāna Awakening of Faith'': Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn zhēnwèi biàn 大乘起信論真偽辯 ==	+	The '''Debate over the authenticity of the ''Mahāyāna Awakening of Faith'' (Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn zhēnwèi biàn 大乘起信論真偽辯)''' was an argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wǔchāng Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Chinese Inner Studies Institute [[支那內學院]] in Nánjīng [[南京]]. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.
-		+
-	An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wǔchāng Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Chinese Inner Studies Institute [[支那內學院]] in Nánjīng [[南京]]. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.	+

	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Inner Studies Institute, later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with his ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Ēnyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporting the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.		The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Inner Studies Institute, later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with his ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Ēnyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporting the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.

		+	{{Ideology Editor}}

-	~~{{Ideology Editor}}~~	+	== References ==
-	~~----~~	+
-	~~'''~~References~~:'''~~	+
	* Aviv, Eyal. "Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu (1871-1943) and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism." Ph.D. Dissert. Harvard University, 2008. Pp. 119-165.		* Aviv, Eyal. "Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu (1871-1943) and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism." Ph.D. Dissert. Harvard University, 2008. Pp. 119-165.
	* {{XFRC}} Pp. 1.809c-80a.		* {{XFRC}} Pp. 1.809c-80a.

	[[Category:Ideology]]		[[Category:Ideology]]

Erik hammerstrom at 13:30, 14 June 2010

2010-06-14T13:30:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 14 June 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	----		----
	'''References:'''		'''References:'''
-	* Aviv, Eyal. "Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu (1871-1943)	+	* Aviv, Eyal. "Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu (1871-1943) and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism." Ph.D. Dissert. Harvard University, 2008. Pp. 119-165.
-	and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism." Ph.D. Dissert. Harvard University, 2008. Pp. 119-165.	+
	* {{XFRC}} Pp. 1.809c-80a.		* {{XFRC}} Pp. 1.809c-80a.

	[[Category:Ideology]]		[[Category:Ideology]]

Erik hammerstrom at 13:29, 14 June 2010

2010-06-14T13:29:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 14 June 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	----		----
	'''References:'''		'''References:'''
		+	* Aviv, Eyal. "Differentiating the Pearl From the Fish Eye: Ouyang Jingwu (1871-1943)
		+	and the Revival of Scholastic Buddhism." Ph.D. Dissert. Harvard University, 2008. Pp. 119-165.
	* {{XFRC}} Pp. 1.809c-80a.		* {{XFRC}} Pp. 1.809c-80a.

	[[Category:Ideology]]		[[Category:Ideology]]

Greg: moved 大乘起信論真偽辯 to Dasheng qixin lun zhenwei bian 大乘起信論真偽辯

2010-06-10T14:43:00Z

moved 大乘起信論真偽辯 to Dasheng qixin lun zhenwei bian 大乘起信論真偽辯

← Older revision

Revision as of 14:43, 10 June 2010

Erik hammerstrom at 21:09, 29 January 2010

2010-01-29T21:09:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 29 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Debate over the authenticity of the ''Mahāyāna Awakening of Faith'': Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn zhēnwèi biàn 大乘起信論真偽辯 ==		== Debate over the authenticity of the ''Mahāyāna Awakening of Faith'': Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn zhēnwèi biàn 大乘起信論真偽辯 ==

-	An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the ~~Wuchang~~ Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Chinese Inner Studies Institute [[支那內學院]] in ~~Nanjing~~. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.	+	An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wǔchāng Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Chinese Inner Studies Institute [[支那內學院]] in Nánjīng [[南京]]. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.
		+
		+	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Inner Studies Institute, later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with his ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Ēnyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporting the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.

-	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Inner Studies Institute, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporting the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.

	{{Ideology Editor}}		{{Ideology Editor}}

Erik hammerstrom at 19:49, 6 January 2010

2010-01-06T19:49:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 6 January 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Inner Studies Institute, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporting the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.		The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Inner Studies Institute, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporting the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.

		+	{{Ideology Editor}}
	----		----
	'''References:'''		'''References:'''

Erik hammerstrom at 15:05, 10 July 2009

2009-07-10T15:05:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 10 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wuchang Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Chinese Inner Studies Institute [[支那內學院]] in Nanjing. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.		An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wuchang Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Chinese Inner Studies Institute [[支那內學院]] in Nanjing. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.

-	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the ~~Zhīnà nèixué yuàn~~, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng ~~supporter~~ the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.	+	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Inner Studies Institute, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporting the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.

	----		----
	'''References:'''		'''References:'''
-	* ~~Yú Língbō 于凌波, ed. ''Xiàndài Fójiào rénwù cídiǎn'' 現代佛教人物辭典 (A Dictionary of Modern Buddhist Persons), 2 vols. Taipei: Foguang, 2004.~~ Pp. 1.809c-80a.	+	* {{XFRC}} Pp. 1.809c-80a.

	[[Category:Ideology]]		[[Category:Ideology]]

Erik hammerstrom at 12:32, 21 June 2009

2009-06-21T12:32:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 21 June 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	----		----
	'''References:'''		'''References:'''
-		+	* Yú Língbō 于凌波, ed. ''Xiàndài Fójiào rénwù cídiǎn'' 現代佛教人物辭典 (A Dictionary of Modern Buddhist Persons), 2 vols. Taipei: Foguang, 2004. Pp. 1.809c-80a.
-	Yú Língbō 于凌波, ed. ''Xiàndài ~~fójiào~~ rénwù cídiǎn'' 現代佛教人物辭典 (A Dictionary of Modern Buddhist Persons), 2 vols. (Taipei: Foguang, 2004), 1:809c-80a.	+

	[[Category:Ideology]]		[[Category:Ideology]]

Erik hammerstrom at 14:32, 22 May 2009

2009-05-22T14:32:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 22 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Debate over the authenticity of the ''Mahāyāna Awakening of Faith'': Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn zhēnwèi biàn 大乘起信論真偽辯 ==		== Debate over the authenticity of the ''Mahāyāna Awakening of Faith'': Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn zhēnwèi biàn 大乘起信論真偽辯 ==

-	An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wuchang Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the ~~Zhīnà nèixué yuàn~~ [[支那內學院]] in Nanjing. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.	+	An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wuchang Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Chinese Inner Studies Institute [[支那內學院]] in Nanjing. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.

	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Zhīnà nèixué yuàn, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporter the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.		The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Zhīnà nèixué yuàn, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporter the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.

Erik hammerstrom at 14:24, 22 May 2009

2009-05-22T14:24:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 22 May 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wuchang Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Zhīnà nèixué yuàn [[支那內學院]] in Nanjing. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.		An argument that broke out in the mid 1920s, primarily between Tàixū [[太虛]], and his confederates and students at the Wuchang Buddhist Seminary [[武昌佛學院]] on the one hand, and Ōuyáng Jìngwú [[歐陽竟無]] and his confederates and students at the Zhīnà nèixué yuàn [[支那內學院]] in Nanjing. At issue was whether the important Chinese Buddhist text ''the Awakening of Faith'' 起信論 was written by Aśvaghoṣa in India as the tradition states, or was in fact written in medieval China.

-	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Zhīnà nèixué yuàn, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[~~王恩陽~~]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporter the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.	+	The debate began with a lecture given by Ōuyáng Jìngwú at the Zhīnà nèixué yuàn, and later published as ''Wéishì juézé lùn'' 唯識抉擇論 (Selected Discourses on Consciousness-Only), which contained statements doubting the Indian origin of ''the Awakening of Faith''. Tàixū responded with ''Fófǎ zǒng juézé lùn'' 佛法總抉擇論 (General Selected Discourses on the Buddha Dharma). After this exchange, Liáng Qǐchāo 梁啓超 weighed in with ''Dàshéng qǐxìn lùn kǎozhèng'' 大乘起信論考證 (Evidential Analysis of ''the Awakening of Faith''). At this point Oūyang's student Wáng Enyáng [[王恩洋]] and Tàixū's colleague Táng Dàyuán [[唐大圓]] both published articles on the topic, with Wáng supporter the idea of a Chinese origin for the text, and Táng supporting the traditional position.

	----		----